Conservatism Item ID: #431Defining Conservatism: The Principles That Will Bring Our Country BackProduct Information:
Item DescriptionJonathan Krohn is a dedicated young man who describes himself as an freethinker. In his book Defining Conservatism Jonathan presents conservative philosophy’s basic tenets in this remarkably earnest and impeccably reasoned primer. This book, clear and informative, is a history lesson, a manifesto, and a roadmap for the future. It is Krohn’s rallying call to action not just for conservatives, but for anyone interested in the political state of our nation.
In Defining Conservatism, Krohn challenges “government expansionists,” whose faith in Washington and the basic pillars of government exceeds their faith in the individual. At the same time, he boldly stakes out four unshakable principles for conservatives to rally around : * Respect for the Constitution Anyone interested in the basic differences between conservative and liberal thought will find Krohn’s writing at once compelling, informative, intelligent, and—for those who do not agree with him—in some respects controversial. Defining Conservatism is a must-read for anyone who is interested in the basic principles upon which the United States was founded, and perhaps most importantly, for anyone who is concerned with the future of this country. Item Reviews6 Responses to “Defining Conservatism: The Principles That Will Bring Our Country Back”Leave a Reply |
|
English 
French 
Bulgarian 
German 
Spanish 
Russian 
Persian 
Portuguese 
Norwegian 
Bookmark This Page 
Email A Friend 
Print This Page 
Help With This Item 
I’ll give this kid three stars for effort and accomplishment. For the book itself, it’s the standard boiler-plate conservatism I’ve been around since I started running around with College Republicans and reading David Horowitz back in 2002/2003. I’d encourage Mr. Krohn to look in the direction of Russell Kirk (and WFB, who I understand is already one of his heroes) rather than the populist strain of conservatism. Still, a good number of young people his age can’t name all 50 states so he’s well ahead of the game.
Everyone who votes should read this book! Your 5th grade children should read this book (earlier if AG). If you believe that learning about conservatism will confirm your negative concepts, you should prepare to be surprised. You will get all of the basics and much more, in a very readable style.
This is a well written book by a young and coming author. His well formed and cogent arguments should give all readers, both liberal and conservative pause to rethink their positions and perhaps formulate a new position. This was well worth the investment.
Someone left this book on a table at my local bookshop, and since I had some time to kill, I speed-read through it. This is possible because the font size is slightly larger, the book itself relatively slender, and the prose rambling but not especially difficult to follow. And I was intruigued enough about the author to look him up. He has some speeches on YouTube and has been the subject of the occasional article in a few major publications.
The construction values of the book itself were also far from terrible for a minor press. It should hold up for a while although the boards are awfully thin. It might not “shelve” well in a tight bookcase without developing a spine slope and unaffixed leaves. But. the dust jacket photo is also positively grim, and the photographer and publisher should be embarrassed. But, to the book itself.
First off, kudos to any child of any age who wants to write. This should always be encouraged. And in one of the recent interviews I saw, the young man disdained the current use of inflammatory rheoric in political discourse like “socialist” and “fascist.” And this is not at variance with the overall muted tone of the book in spite of its bloated title. Further, his regard for Professor William Bennett is unabashed and admiring. This is evident for reasons I will explain.
My concerns about the author himself are as follows. He is a child actor, literally. Although this is hardly a disqualifier, his speeches as CPAC were, indeed, “hammy” and overly-rehearsed, more recitations of the talking points popular at that time than anything fresh or new. This is not a problem, though. Speeches at such political events are routinely canned to fit the audience. It is rare that, say, a Bob Barr will take an “outrider” position at rah-rah affairs regardless of political orientation. Still, I always have a narrow suspicion of actors as paid political commentators in the vein of, for example, Meryl Streep’s congressional testimony about Alar and apples years ago. Second, this book, according to the “Times,” also had the aid of a “grammarian.” So, I have to wonder about the extent of the undisclosed ghost writing involved. Lastly, I am always deeply concerned when children are used as political shills. Be it Sarah Palin’s baby, the young man who spoke at the “Million Man March” some years back and whose name now escapes me, or the young gentleman here, it always strikes me as odd – and even weird – when minors, no matter how gifted or adorable, are deployed in such a fashion. One has to wonder if “Pinocchio” is a real boy or still something of wood and string.
Questions of credibility aside, the book itself was completely, totally unremarkable save the novelty value the author provides. Nothing in it was original insofar as I could see, and it also struck me that parts of it were little more than watered-down rehash of sections of Bill Bennett’s “The Book of Virtues.” Given the author’s uncritical (insofar as any young adolescent is capable of higher order critical thinking) admiration for Bennett, this is perhaps not surprising. But, the “moral lessons” are nothing but a feeble paraphrase of Bennett’s anthology at best and self-help lingo at worst. And the citations to great thinkers like Plato and Aristotle seemed, to me, to be more than a protracted exercise in “name dropping” than anything approaching a comprehensive engagement of thought as it might – or might not – apply to the modern era. And I am sorry to say this, but Krohn is obssessively Manichean in his “analysis,” a notorious trait of most adolescents simply as a matter of human development. Philosophy and understanding philosophy come at least as much from age and sober, measured experience as reading great works, and it is not possible for me to accept that someone of this age possesses those experiences enough to comment on people like the incredibly complex and urbane Jefferson, for example, in anything but the most superficial manner. Being “gifted” and “understanding” are different quotients. I don’t blame him for trying, though. It’s tough.
As to the political sections, I will leave those alone. The one and two star reviews in this thread do a superior job in dissecting those, and I really have nothing to add that has not already been said a millon times. And again, the watchword is “superficiality.” But one must needs expect nothing less from a child, especially one who is doing little more than parroting what others have already discussed or said. And that’s really all he does. It’s definitely “Reader’s Digest” fare.
But, two stars for the fact that a child who writes, even in this cynical circus, might be an example to others who dream of publishing something one day, political patronage or no.
But, overall, this book is dreadful for adult readers, nothing more than a protracted excercise in paraphrase. A teen might like it. Maybe. But I would not press it.
“And a child will lead them,” as the old chestnut goes. Just watch out for the cliff. It’s a whopper.
No recommendation.
If anyone was under the impression that the only segments of the US population that comprise the ranks of the Tea Party activists and the Conservative movement are upscale baby boomers, middle-aged Glenn Beck aficionados or white haired Republicans from affluent suburbs in the Midwest, then we must think again. In his meticulously researched thesis-like exegesis on the rise of Marxist style government expansionism and it’s egregious consequences for the future of freedom in America, 14 year-old Jonathan Krohn steps up to the plate and sounds a clarion call to yet a new generation of American Conservatives.
“Defining Conservatism” (Vanguard Press – 2010) is Mr. Krohn’s first book and may very well serve as the gold standard in textbook primers for those wishing to learn about the genesis of our constitutional freedoms, the deleterious ramifications to our liberty that judicial activism represents and how our collective “moral compass” must be preserved at all costs. Mr. Krohn deftly conveys his hypothesis from the perspective of a seasoned logician; promulgating an empirical, highly reasoned and profoundly rational approach to the reality of Conservatism. Unlike other books of this genre, this child prodigy steers clear of psychological manipulation, emotional appeals and ad hominem attacks against those he disagrees with. Rather, he engages in positive didactics, offering a cut and dry examination of natural law, individual rights, state sovereignty, rule of law, personal responsibility, morality, the purpose and value of life, judicial philosophy and activism and limited government as defined from the perch of a strict constructionist.
Citing a plethora of sources including the writings of Aristotle and Plato and more modern political theorists as Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, C.S. Lewis, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Mr. Krohn makes persuasive arguments for prudent constitutional interpretations as he spotlights the stark contrasts between individualism and victimization, the role of the public and private sectors in creating wealth, and the nefarious agenda of universalist government expansionism. Referring to several major US Supreme Court cases including the 1973 Roe v Wade decision, Mr. Krohn illustrates the intrusion of the federal government into the scared domain of the principles of federalism and states rights. Calling Roe v Wade, “very shoddy jurisprudence” and informing us of “serious constitutional flaws in the Supreme Court’s argument”, Mr. Krohn concludes that “the reasoning use to prove the sacred and inherent nature of life must be applied to the debate within the states, and the constitutional argument for natural rights must apply legally in the states just as much as it is applied to the whole of society.”
He also takes on social theory and the victim mentality when he points to such Supreme Court cases as Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, when James Dale, a homosexual advocate for “gay rights” challenged the legality of the Boy Scouts’ decision to remove him from his position as an assistant scoutmaster. The Court upheld a lower court ruling defending the decision of the Boy Scouts, Says Mr. Krohn: “The victim mentality’s use of the due-process clause as a means to embrace a left-wing agenda is a misuse of it” adding that, “the victim does not come for justice, however, but for vengeance against the unaccommodating, the inconvenient, and anyone who stands in his or her own way.”
A staunch defender of capitalism and the inherent rights of the individual as the creator of wealth, Mr. Krohn believes that a harmonious relationship between the public and private sectors must be established but also points out that the concept of free trade which distinctly defines capitalism must also be free of dictation by the public sector. He stands in fierce opposition to government “bail-outs” and takeovers of the banking and automotive industries in the fear it will lead to state economic collectivism; based on “the Marxist theory of economics, a stated theory that because government must expand for the “good” of the changing society, so must the economy”, he says.
Mr. Krohn’s book could not have been released at a more propitious time. Concerning his views on the polarizing universal health care reform bill, which many consider to be the most irresponsible piece of domestic legislation in the history of the United States, Mr. Krohn intones, “instead of admitting that universal health care is government’s theft of the private sector’s health-care industry, the romanticist brands it as free health care for the uninsured” adding that “the expansionist government appears to be a charity instead of a greedy power grabber in the eyes of the citizenry.” He also probes the commerce clause of the constitution and while not specifically stating as such, one can readily conclude that the basis of the new healthcare reform bill is in direct violation of this constitutional protection.
It is not clear whether Mr. Krohn will pursue a career as a constitutional expert or a conservative political theorist and/or pundit, but it is clear that this exceptionally intelligent young man will be a force to be reckoned with as he navigates the multi-faceted trajectories of the universe of American Conservatism. His love for his country serves as his impetus as he states, “I believe that America is truly great. It is the American enshrinement of freedom as a right that has made nations abroad draw themselves into the loving arms of republican government.”
At age 13 Jonathan Krohn who describes himself as an freethinker wrote and published Defining Conservatism. This is a book that everyone who wants to better understand Conservatism should read. Don’t let this kids age stop you from reading the book.